Moulin Rouge.
Nov. 27th, 2007 12:21 pm[Poll #1096141]I have an interesting theory that some movies just evoke strong reactions in people. Positive and negative. I am curious as to your Moulin Rouge opinions. Please also feel free to go off in the comments.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-27 08:27 pm (UTC)Most importantly, it *tries*. And just as importantly, it takes itself seriously even in its excess. And I admire that, even if I don't *love* it. It's certainly a movies I would recommend to people, and that's saying something right there.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 01:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-27 08:28 pm (UTC)Also, a film with ambition. Despite its humor, it wasn't undercutting *itself*.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 01:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-27 08:28 pm (UTC)As for the second half of the quiz, I think my feelings are ultimately "Meh." I like the film, but wouldn't really miss anything beyond "Your Song" if I never saw it again.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 01:52 am (UTC)i used to love it when hal from the castro would blast that for rich and i at the castro before the house lights were on. we would lay on the stage with the whole movie palace above us with the music pumping loud through the place - through the dolby speakers. completely in the dark. you could feel it in your blood!
no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 04:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-27 09:00 pm (UTC)Mostly, I love it except for that bit.
Eyecandy and jukeboxy, it is what it is.
Now, for movies that really polarize, I'd start out with Fight Club & American Psycho.People really seemed to love or hate those two, critics as well as movie heads---which can be quite unique.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-27 09:08 pm (UTC)I agree.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 01:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 03:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-27 09:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 01:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 02:30 am (UTC)I still have fun watching Moulin Rouge when it's on TV though. :)
no subject
Date: 2007-11-27 10:02 pm (UTC)But I've only seen it a couple times, and it is heterosexual monogamy issues, woman not sticking up for what she wants, etc, so I think I'd rather see it in pieces sometimes.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 01:47 am (UTC)for me i can't really dissect any of the romances i love because what makes me connect to them is just so painfully problematic.
or rather - i can and do dissect them. but then i kinda try to go LALALALALALALALA
no subject
Date: 2007-11-27 10:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 01:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 01:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 02:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 02:36 am (UTC)the style definately seems to grate to an unbearable degree on some folks. did you see his romeo and juliet? i am curious what you thought of that.
i saw it and was intrigued - and enjoyed it - but don't have any real attachment to it.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 01:42 am (UTC)i think it lends itself to making things feel more chaotic and claustrophic and like time is moving too fast for the characters in the film. it (for me) adds to the whirlwind of it. but i sense the part of me that loves it is the same part that likes deconstructive math rock.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 12:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 01:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 01:00 am (UTC)Ever.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 01:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 01:39 am (UTC)epitome of pure love and cinematic goodness is where i fall in line.
i bought this film hook line and sinker. i agree the story is simple. and it has to be to be able to throw a purity of heart plotline in amongst all of the baroque imagery and still work. at the end i sob every time. because it's always the truest loves that fail so magnificently. they fail because the lovers are trying to hold onto a perfection. some sort of noble honor where they would (and do) give their lives for the other and it still falls short. like a lover running to catch the airplane or the train - but they always depart. it just... oooh right under my skin. and ewan macgregor sings with the most open look on his face. it's like a tunnel into this honest trusting love. a complete lack of cynicism even in the face of so much reason for cynicism. i yearn for that trust and belief in joy and i don't think it's attainable either. but it reminds of gene kellys face when he dances. amazing.
though i do wish there was more leguizamo in it.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 01:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 02:34 am (UTC)plus of course the music
no subject
Date: 2007-11-29 11:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 01:40 am (UTC)I've been working on it, though. A little bit.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 01:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 01:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 01:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 05:08 am (UTC)I turned it off when the people in fancy dress and can-can clothes were doing something I recall as being like "Thriller" to a Nirvana song. There was something, in my mind, so incredibly wrong about that, and cheesy just didn't even begin to cover it.
I did try and watch it through again... but just wasn't impressed or all that interested.